Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Resource\s+utilization\s+on\s+TSM\s+server\s+5\.3\.2\.0\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Resource\s+utilization\s+on\s+TSM\s+server\s+5\.3\.2\.0\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Resource utilization on TSM server 5.3.2.0 (score: 1): Author: "Stapleton, Mark" <mark.stapleton AT BERBEE DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:37:26 -0600; Keep in mind that resourceutilization is a client function, not a server function. -- Mark Stapleton (stapleton AT berbee DOT com) IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional Tivoli Storage Manage; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-11/msg00185.html (11,255 bytes)
2. Re: Resource utilization on TSM server 5.3.2.0 (score: 1): Author: Henrik Wahlstedt <SHWL AT STATOIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:29:42 +0100; Yes you are right. But I know that my Server also utilize resources like buffpoolsize, cpu and I/O. Maybe resource utilization wasn´t the best choice of words since it is a client option. ;-) So, ha; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-11/msg00190.html (12,251 bytes)
3. Re: Resource utilization on TSM server 5.3.2.0 (score: 1): Author: Helder Garcia <helder.garcia AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 06:07:34 -0300; I don't know behind the scenes, but some default values of memory/buffers configurations had been increased. -- Helder Garcia; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-11/msg00191.html (13,051 bytes)
4. Resource utilization on TSM server 5.3.2.0 (score: 1): Author: Henrik Wahlstedt <SHWL AT STATOIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:58:48 +0200; Hello, I havent read anything about resource utilization on TSM server 5.3. My questions are. Will 5.3 use/need more memory, CPU and/or I/O? Most of the times when I upgrade my systems one or more HW; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-10/msg00528.html (10,751 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]