Author: Mike Stewart <STEWAJM AT AUDUCADM.DUC.AUBURN DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 1997 15:13:00 -0500
** Original Author: ADSM-L @ MARIST - ** Remote User **; 08/07/97 11:02am Date: August 7, 1997 Time: 10:23 AM From: Jerry Lawson The Hartford Insurance Group (860) 547-2960 jlawson AT thehartford DOT
<snip - removed original message text - snip> ** Comments From: STEWAJM - Stewart, Mike; 08/07/97 12:54pm You might check your bufpoolsize. If your devices are staying that busy you might be able to
Author: "Pittson, Timothy ,HiServ/NA" <tpittson AT HIMAIL.HCC DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 09:24:09 -0400
Jerry, An 86% hit ratio is very low for ADSM... Try bumping up the bufpoolsize to a minumum of 16384 or possibly 32768. The logpoolsize seems a little low also.. if you do a Q LOG F=D and notice any
Jerry Lawson jlawson AT thehartford DOT com Jerry, An 86% hit ratio is very low for ADSM... Try bumping up the bufpoolsize to a minumum of 16384 or possibly 32768. The logpoolsize seems a little low
Author: "Pittson, Timothy ,HiServ/NA" <tpittson AT HIMAIL.HCC DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 10:23:53 -0400
Jerry, ADSM takes it buffers from above the line.... if you wanted to take the conservative route you could start out by bumping the bufpoolsize to 8192, monitoring the cache hit ratio, then raising