Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Recommendations\s+for\s+hardware\s+replacement\/upgrade\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Recommendations for hardware replacement/upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:11:51 -0500
We are looking to phase-out our 2-AIX TSM servers and replace them with Linux/Dell boxes (state contract - don't have a choice on the hardware). They have asked me to come up with some prefered specs
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-01/msg00074.html (12,153 bytes)

2. Re: Recommendations for hardware replacement/upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Mark Stapleton <mark.s AT EVOLVINGSOL DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:02:40 -0600
hardware). You do realize, of course, that you won't be able to move the TSM database from AIX to Windows. -- Mark Stapleton (mark.s AT evolvingsol DOT com) Senior consultant
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-01/msg00080.html (12,354 bytes)

3. Re: Recommendations for hardware replacement/upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Svetoslav Tolev <Bugs AT BULMAG DOT BG>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:01:35 +0200
You must migrate nodes and data from one server to other... Mark Stapleton <mark.s AT EVOLVINGSOL DOT COM> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> 09.01.2007 06:03 Please res
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-01/msg00081.html (12,773 bytes)

4. Re: Recommendations for hardware replacement/upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:59:20 -0500
Windows is not in the picture. These are going to be RH Linux systems. We will probably perform EXPORT TO SERVER to move the clients, one by one, since we are probably going to move to new media type
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-01/msg00085.html (12,936 bytes)

5. Re: Recommendations for hardware replacement/upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Bob Booth <booth AT UIUC DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:06:07 -0600
Look for the type of system that will give you the most PCI-X bandwidth you can get. You are going to be pumping quite a bit of data across that bus, with presumably 4Gb HBA's, some SCSI (?), network
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-01/msg00091.html (12,547 bytes)

6. Re: Recommendations for hardware replacement/upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Roger Deschner <rogerd AT UIC DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:07:17 -0600
I/O bandwidth is the key. Since these new systems cannot match the I/O bandwidth of the AIX pSeries systems they are replacing, count on having to run MORE SERVERS to accomplish the same work. Having
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-01/msg00104.html (13,943 bytes)

7. Re: Recommendations for hardware replacement/upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:03:01 -0500
Thanks for the suggestions. Unfortunately, we are highly unlikely to get 4GB HBAs, especially since nothing in our SAN fabric goes higher than 2GB GBICs. Bob Booth <booth AT UIUC DOT EDU> Sent by: "A
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-01/msg00111.html (13,047 bytes)

8. Re: Recommendations for hardware replacement/upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:08:22 -0500
Thanks for the feedback. Yes, I realize you can't beat AIX for I/O bandwidth. Unfortunately, it comes down to $$$$$$ (doesn't it, always). I agree it would be beneficial to break things up. However,
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-01/msg00112.html (15,248 bytes)

9. Re: Recommendations for hardware replacement/upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:04:13 -0500
I think your $/performance-unit is much better on AIX than it will be in intel-land. I call the x86 option cheap now, pricey later. But you've already said that AIX isn't on the table. I don't under
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-01/msg00121.html (13,380 bytes)

10. Re: Recommendations for hardware replacement/upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:19:07 -0500
We never have enough resources. The 4-LTO drives in one library, are shared amongst 3-TSM servers which transfer over 2TB, nightly. The 4th TSM server is dedicated to Domino backups, which use it's 4
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-01/msg00122.html (14,734 bytes)

11. Re: Recommendations for hardware replacement/upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Lipp <lipp AT STORSERVER DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:26:05 -0700
Zoltan, I did a consulting gig at a large TSM site a million years ago that sounds similar to yours. In their case, they had a TSM server that was flat out 24*7 and did not have enough time to do eve
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-01/msg00128.html (16,320 bytes)

12. Re: Recommendations for hardware replacement/upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Roger Deschner <rogerd AT UIC DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:09:24 -0600
Actually, it will work just fine. Any number of TSM server images on one computer can share a physical tape drive connection (or tape drive partition) with no additional contention problems, beyond t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-01/msg00131.html (16,959 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu