Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*REGBack\s+NO\s+option\s+in\s+NT\-client\s+not\s+working\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*REGBack\s+NO\s+option\s+in\s+NT\-client\s+not\s+working\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. REGBack NO option in NT-client not working. (score: 1): Author: "Roel Alkema Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut, Groningen" <ALKEMA AT KVI DOT NL>; Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 17:23:35 +0100; Does anyone have an idea how it is possible that I still receive the message in the logfile that the registry was succesfully saved, when I have the REGback NO option supplied in the dsm.opt file? Th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-10/msg00925.html (11,452 bytes)
2. Re: REGBack NO option in NT-client not working. (score: 1): Author: Joanne Nguyen <nguyenjt AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 12:20:42 -0400; Roel, The option is BACKUPRegistry and not REGBack. Please try that. Joanne Nguyen ADSM Client Development Does anyone have an idea how it is possible that I still receive the message in the logfile; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-10/msg00931.html (11,756 bytes)
3. Re: REGBack NO option in NT-client not working. (score: 1): Author: Guy Soleme <Guy_Soleme AT BE.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 18:46:25 +0000; Roel, Because the option is : BACKUPR NO Regards-Groeten-Salutations Tel. : 718.41.87, Fax : 718.43.39, E-Mail : Guy_Soleme AT be.ibm DOT com, LN : Guy Soleme/Belgium/IBM@IBMBE Does anyone have an id; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-10/msg00937.html (11,800 bytes)
4. Re: REGBack NO option in NT-client not working. (score: 1): Author: "Roel Alkema Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut, Groningen" <ALKEMA AT KVI DOT NL>; Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 08:59:30 +0100; You are right, but on the file I have used the correct syntax. Sorry that I used the wrong one in my mail.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-10/msg00950.html (12,156 bytes)
5. Re: REGBack NO option in NT-client not working. (score: 1): Author: Joanne Nguyen <nguyenjt AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 17:55:49 -0500; Roel, Are you sure you didn't misspell anything or look at an old error log? I tried the level 0.5 client and it works. If you issue dsmc i (default to the system drive), and you don't see any messag; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-10/msg00969.html (12,603 bytes)
6. Re: REGBack NO option in NT-client not working. (score: 1): Author: "Roel Alkema Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut, Groningen" <ALKEMA AT KVI DOT NL>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 12:49:34 +0100; Joanne, You hit the point I think. It is working correctly when I use the dsmc i command by hand, but not when the incremental backup is started through the scheduler automatically. So can you give m; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-10/msg00974.html (13,380 bytes)
7. Re: REGBack NO option in NT-client not working. (score: 1): Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 09:12:21 -0500; Hello Roel, I tried using the ADSM scheduler service to do a backup, and it does honor the BACKUPREG NO option. You should check a couple of things: 1) Do a QUERY SCHEDULE F=D for your schedule. Is -; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-10/msg00979.html (14,247 bytes)
8. Re: REGBack NO option in NT-client not working. (score: 1): Author: "Roel Alkema Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut, Groningen" <ALKEMA AT KVI DOT NL>; Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 15:05:14 +0100; Thanks Andy, Here are the results The OPTIONS field is empty. No it does not backup the registry, and the rest of the includes/excludes are also working properly. Yes, I am shure, there is only one f; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-10/msg01019.html (15,598 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]