Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Question\:\s+How\s+to\s+control\s+max\s+mounts\s+per\s+stgp\/node\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Question\:\s+How\s+to\s+control\s+max\s+mounts\s+per\s+stgp\/node\.\.\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Question: How to control max mounts per stgp/node... (score: 1): Author: Shane Shrybman <shane AT ZEKE.YI DOT ORG>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:38:47 -0500; Can someone give suggestions on how to control the maximum number of concurrent mounts based on stgp or node or some other parameter. I want to stop one client from being able to 'hog' all of the dri; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00541.html (11,212 bytes)
2. Re: Question: How to control max mounts per stgp/node... (score: 1): Author: Nick Cassimatis <nickpc AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 13:25:01 -0500; The only way I can think to do that would be to have a different deviceclass name for each pool. Then you can set the number of mount points through that. This is not a new device type (drive), so th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00545.html (11,570 bytes)
3. Re: Question: How to control max mounts per stgp/node... (score: 1): Author: "Joshua S. Bassi" <jbassi AT GLORYWORKS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 10:41:03 -0800; There was a new paramemeter introduced with the TSM 3.7 server. The parm is "maxnummp" and is defined on a per node basis. So if you are on this verion of *SM, you can update your nodes with a maximu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00549.html (11,467 bytes)
4. Question: How to control max mounts per stgp/node... (score: 1): Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:35:05 -0500; Can someone give suggestions on how to control the maximum number of concurrent mounts based on stgp or node or some other parameter. I want to stop one client from being able to 'hog' all of the dri; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00550.html (11,371 bytes)
5. Re: Question: How to control max mounts per stgp/node... (score: 1): Author: Shane Shrybman <shane AT ZEKE.YI DOT ORG>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 18:45:42 -0500; Yes, this is the only thing I could think of as well. Could you rephrase/expand the last sentence above? How would the drives "share between the pools"? I thought that under this scenario the drives; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00572.html (11,757 bytes)
6. Re: Question: How to control max mounts per stgp/node... (score: 1): Author: Shane Shrybman <shane AT ZEKE.YI DOT ORG>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 18:47:45 -0500; We are running version 3.1.2.50. Sorry for not stating this in my original post. Thanks for the suggestion. Shane; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00573.html (11,491 bytes)
7. Re: Question: How to control max mounts per stgp/node... (score: 1): Author: Nick Cassimatis <nickpc AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:47:48 -0500; What I mean is that a specific drive will not be assigned to a specific pool. The assignment doesn't have to go below the level of the deviceclass. Nick Cassimatis nickpc AT us.ibm DOT com If you do; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00600.html (11,653 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]