Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Pre\-Initialized\s+Tapes\s+\-\s+do\s+they\s+need\s+to\s+be\s+labeled\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Pre\-Initialized\s+Tapes\s+\-\s+do\s+they\s+need\s+to\s+be\s+labeled\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Pre-Initialized Tapes - do they need to be labeled? (score: 1): Author: Dave Canan <ddcanan AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>; Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 21:29:03 -0700; I am throwing this out the list to get an answer. If you order "pre-labeled" tapes to use with TSM, does this mean that they do not need to go through the "label libv" process? This may seem like a s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-07/msg00645.html (11,851 bytes)
2. Re: Pre-Initialized Tapes - do they need to be labeled? (score: 1): Author: Fred Johanson <fred AT MIDWAY.UCHICAGO DOT EDU>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:41:20 -0500; We've been ordering "pre-labelled" 3590 carts since we went to the 3494 in ADSM V2. Never had a problem. Quoting Dave Canan <ddcanan AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>: Fred Johanson; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-07/msg00647.html (12,222 bytes)
3. Re: Pre-Initialized Tapes - do they need to be labeled? (score: 1): Author: Bill Smoldt <smoldt AT STORSOL DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:14:45 -0600; I've talked with sites that ordered pre-labeled and got EBCDIC - make sure they specify ANSI ASCII. Bill Smoldt STORServer, Inc. I am throwing this out the list to get an answer. If you order "pre-la; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-07/msg00651.html (12,333 bytes)
4. Re: Pre-Initialized Tapes - do they need to be labeled? (score: 1): Author: "Bos, Karel" <Karel.Bos AT ATOSORIGIN DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:04:10 +0200; Hi, Maybe a little off topic, but using AUTOlabel is also a fine method of reducing time spent on labeling libvols. Regards, Karel I've talked with sites that ordered pre-labeled and got EBCDIC - mak; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-07/msg00653.html (12,767 bytes)
5. Re: Pre-Initialized Tapes - do they need to be labeled? (score: 1): Author: Jim Kirkman <jmk AT EMAIL.UNC DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:12:49 -0400; In our case, where TSM runs on our MVS (actually Z\OS) instance this is the case. We have never had to go through the label process. I would question whether it would be so if the library was partiti; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-07/msg00655.html (12,827 bytes)
6. Re: Pre-Initialized Tapes - do they need to be labeled? (score: 1): Author: fred johanson <fred AT MIDWAY.UCHICAGO DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:41:07 -0500; In our case, the 3494 is dedicated to *SM running on AIX. I would question whether it would be so if the library was partitioned. We've been ordering "pre-labelled" 3590 carts since we went to the 34; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-07/msg00658.html (13,268 bytes)
7. Re: Pre-Initialized Tapes - do they need to be labeled? (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:57:40 -0400; TSM writes the same IBM standard internal label as MVS does, even if not running on MVS. But as Bill said, order them ASCII labels. I am throwing this out the list to get an answer. If you order "pre; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-07/msg00672.html (12,355 bytes)
8. Re: Pre-Initialized Tapes - do they need to be labeled? (score: 1): Author: CORP Rick Willmore <RWillmore AT RSAC DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:07:12 -0700; I have been bitten before by not "labeling" tapes that were ordered prelabeled. ALWAYS LABEL LIBV!~!!! R. TSM writes the same IBM standard internal label as MVS does, even if not running on MVS. But; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-07/msg00673.html (12,679 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]