- 1. Performance pathology (score: 1)
- Author: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT MAIL.TJU DOT EDU>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:18:23 -0500
- We are running a TSM 4.2.1.9 server under OS/390. We are experiencing serious performance problems, and I have not been able to find any clear explanation. We currently have two late-running client b
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-12/msg00665.html (10,937 bytes)
- 2. Re: Performance pathology (score: 1)
- Author: John Naylor <john.naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:40:43 +0000
- Thomas, How long has your server been up since a halt of TSM. I am on OS390 TSM Version 4, Release 2, Level 2.0 and I find that it does get slower the longer I leave it between a recycle. So if its b
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-12/msg00667.html (12,383 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu