Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Performance\s+on\s+w2k\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Performance\s+on\s+w2k\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Performance on w2k (score: 1): Author: Christoph Pilgram <Christoph.Pilgram AT BC.BOEHRINGER-INGELHEIM DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:48:48 +0100; Hi all, I have a a question concerning performance on a W2K-Client. On our W2K-fileserver (2 processors, 800000 files, w2k-compression on) we get a very poor performance with our backup (Vers. 4.2.0.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-12/msg00476.html (11,135 bytes)
2. Re: Performance on w2k (score: 1): Author: Joe Cascanette <Joe.Cascanette AT CUMIS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:59:29 -0500; Do you have any of these in the DSM.OPT file? on a 100MB line I get around 10-15Megs/s transfer rate. Not sure if that is good, but ok for me. The resourceutilization 10 was a big help. Joe Cascanett; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-12/msg00480.html (10,430 bytes)
3. Re: Performance on w2k (score: 1): Author: "Joshua S. Bassi" <jbassi AT IHWY DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:16:55 -0800; This issue was just now being discussed in a different thread. What does your dsm.opt look like (especially in the area of TCP performance settings)? -- Joshua S. Bassi Joshua S. Bassi Independent IT; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-12/msg00492.html (10,416 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]