Author: "Stephen A. Cochran" <stephen.a.cochran AT CAHIR DOT NET>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:46:02 -0500
I'm not an expert with ADSM, but does ADSM have any of the advanced features that this article talked about? Can it back up a file only once for all the computers that have a copy of it? Or will it b
These are not desirable features: they are required features for their product since they have to do full backups periodically and TSM does not. In addition, we will exclude winword.exe and never bac
Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:12:13 -0500
I'm not an expert with ADSM, but does ADSM have any of the advanced features that this article talked about? Can it back up a file only once for all the computers that have a copy of it? Or will it b
Author: StorageGroupAdmin StorageGroupAdmin <StorageGroupAdmin AT SYDNEYWATER.COM DOT AU>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:17:20 +1000
I once used a mainframe based backup product called 'Harbor'. This product had the feature you mentioned were it used pointers to a single copy of a file that existed on multiple files. What I would
Author: "Seay, Paul" <seay_pd AT NAPTHEON DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 21:34:25 -0500
Every product has to have a gimmick strong point to make it sell. Same as products that do Exchange mailbox level backup/restore, etc. The reality is this feature sounds good on paper, but in practic
I once used a mainframe based backup product called 'Harbor'. This product had the feature you mentioned were it used pointers to a single copy of a file that existed on multiple files. What I would
Paul, Right on. One would never back that stuff up in the first place so what difference does having that feature make? Kelly J. Lipp Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc. PO Box 51313 Colorado Springs
Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:12:13 -0500
Every product has to have a gimmick strong point to make it sell. Same as products that do Exchange mailbox level backup/restore, etc. The reality is this feature sounds good on paper, but in practic
Author: "Stephen A. Cochran" <stephen.a.cochran AT CAHIR DOT NET>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 23:00:51 -0500
Right on. One would never back that stuff up in the first place so what difference does having that feature make? Well, you'd be supprised how many people do back things like that up. I'm not saying
With respect to that: Say we have 500 10 GB PC's. Say they're 80% full. We back up the whole mess so we get 4 TB of data. That's only forty AIT3/LTO/SDLT tapes. In a large site that's nothing. And si
Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:12:13 -0500
Well, you'd be supprised how many people do back things like that up. I'm not saying I'm advocating it, but it happens. They want their entire hard drive backed up dammit, and that's what they'll get
Author: "Seay, Paul" <seay_pd AT NAPTHEON DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 23:49:09 -0500
Yeah, the university environment has the "mine" attitude at the desktop level. That is just a fact of life. We need those people to educate our future. But, if they would just spend 1 minute of discu
Author: Stephen A. Cochran [mailto:stephen.a.cochran AT CAHIR DOT NET]
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:12:13 -0500
Well, you'd be supprised how many people do back things like that up. I'm not saying I'm advocating it, but it happens. They want their entire hard drive backed up dammit, and that's what they'll get
Author: "Ilja G. Coolen" <ilja.coolen AT ABP DOT NL>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:45:02 +0100
I feel quite fortunate, At our site, which is a pension fund, insurance and morgage supplier, we only backup servers. The users are required to store the data they want backupped, on the fileservers.
Author: Nicholas Cassimatis <nickpc AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:44:31 -0500
Kelly, Let's change "would" to "should" and you'll be dead on! Nick Cassimatis nickpc AT us.ibm DOT com Today is the tomorrow of yesterday. Kelly Lipp <lipp AT storsol DOT com To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST
Yes, but we need the big Tivoli guns saying it in the press, not us rambling about it here. Since their big guns are saying it, we have to defend why we don't one at a time. Makes it very hard to sel
Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:12:13 -0500
Kelly, Let's change "would" to "should" and you'll be dead on! Nick Cassimatis nickpc AT us.ibm DOT com Today is the tomorrow of yesterday. Kelly Lipp <lipp AT storsol DOT com To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST
Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:21:28 -0500
Paul! I didn't know you were one of "us" ! Ah yes - someone else who remembers the Good Ole operating system, that knew how to SEPARATE user data and customization from the OS. As a former mainframe
Author: Seay, Paul [mailto:seay_pd AT NAPTHEON DOT COM]
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:12:13 -0500
Every product has to have a gimmick strong point to make it sell. Same as products that do Exchange mailbox level backup/restore, etc. The reality is this feature sounds good on paper, but in practic
Author: "Joshua S. Bassi" <jbassi AT IHWY DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:42:29 -0800
Today, by default TSM will backup the file on every client. You can customize the settings by excluding *most* stuff found on all these systems and only backup a single full client which would be wha