Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Output\s+of\s+tapetype\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Output of tapetype (score: 1)
Author: "rmckeever"<rmckeever AT earthlink DOT net>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 08:28:29 -0700
Hello, Im learning amanda so thanks for your time. What does this mean when running tapetype: wrote 2266437 32Kb blocks in 6931 files in 28845 seconds (short write) wrote 1826089 32Kb blocks in 11203
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00328.html (10,816 bytes)

2. Re: Output of tapetype (score: 1)
Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 11:56:24 -0400
It means you got VERY different results than 2 others who put their results into the Faq-O-Matic. You got twice the capacity, half the speed, and a substantial waste of space between files compared t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00335.html (11,830 bytes)

3. Re: Output of tapetype (score: 1)
Author: Gene Heskett <gene_heskett AT iolinc DOT net>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 12:07:24 -0400
The above is normal output just so you know that tapetype hasn't gone to vegas to play the slots with your money. :-) Looks good if its supposed to be a 10 gig tape. If not, then check to see if the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00337.html (11,744 bytes)

4. Re: Output of tapetype (score: 1)
Author: Gene Heskett <gene_heskett AT iolinc DOT net>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:20:45 -0400
Darn, I have got to get my eyes recalibrated. 93 GIGS doesn't sound right. -- Cheers, Gene AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M Athlon1600XP@1400mhz 512M 99.15% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00342.html (12,192 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu