- 1. Output of tapetype (score: 1)
- Author: "rmckeever"<rmckeever AT earthlink DOT net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 08:28:29 -0700
- Hello, Im learning amanda so thanks for your time. What does this mean when running tapetype: wrote 2266437 32Kb blocks in 6931 files in 28845 seconds (short write) wrote 1826089 32Kb blocks in 11203
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00328.html (10,816 bytes)
- 2. Re: Output of tapetype (score: 1)
- Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 11:56:24 -0400
- It means you got VERY different results than 2 others who put their results into the Faq-O-Matic. You got twice the capacity, half the speed, and a substantial waste of space between files compared t
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00335.html (11,830 bytes)
- 3. Re: Output of tapetype (score: 1)
- Author: Gene Heskett <gene_heskett AT iolinc DOT net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 12:07:24 -0400
- The above is normal output just so you know that tapetype hasn't gone to vegas to play the slots with your money. :-) Looks good if its supposed to be a 10 gig tape. If not, then check to see if the
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00337.html (11,744 bytes)
- 4. Re: Output of tapetype (score: 1)
- Author: Gene Heskett <gene_heskett AT iolinc DOT net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:20:45 -0400
- Darn, I have got to get my eyes recalibrated. 93 GIGS doesn't sound right. -- Cheers, Gene AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M Athlon1600XP@1400mhz 512M 99.15% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00342.html (12,192 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu