Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Non\-IBM\s+LTO\s+tapes\s+in\s+a\s+3584\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Non\-IBM\s+LTO\s+tapes\s+in\s+a\s+3584\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: Mark Ferraretto <mark.ferraretto AT DB DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:30:57 +0800; All, We're looking at purchasing extra LTO-1 tapes to go in our 3584. To date, we've been running IBM tapes but we've gotten cheaper prices on HP and Imation tapes. Both HP and Imation are priced abo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00323.html (12,145 bytes)
2. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: Mark Farber <rs6000 AT BTINTERNET DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 07:28:46 +0100; Mark I have a customer running a 3583 who also needed more tapes and did not want to pay more for IBM tapes. He instead went for Sony LTO tapes. The interesting thing is that the read/write errors al; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00326.html (13,099 bytes)
3. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: Viliam Varga <vargav AT EUROTEL DOT SK>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:10:48 +0200; hi, mark, within 1 year we use 100 imation and 500 fujifilm ultrium1 tapes in ibm lto drives. approximately 10% of imation tapes we had to return to distributor, because of unloading problems. only 2; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00340.html (13,284 bytes)
4. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: "Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC" <Rene.Lambelet AT NESTLE DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:50:34 +0200; Thanks for the info, we have a LOT of write errors with Imation (except last production series), but none with IBM tapes. René LAMBELET NESTEC SA GLOBE - Global Business Excellence Central Support Ce; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00341.html (14,299 bytes)
5. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: Peter Ford <pford AT STENTOR DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:10:29 -0700; We have 3 IBM LTO libraries in which we have a few IBM tapes, but primarily use Sony and Imation. There was a recall of Imation tapes a short while ago, due to a problem with IBM drives, but the pro; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00350.html (12,710 bytes)
6. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: "Cardoza, George" <George.Cardoza AT PSHS DOT NET>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:52:13 -0700; We have purchased Fuji media and have over 500 LTO tapes in our library. Works just fine. George Mark I have a customer running a 3583 who also needed more tapes and did not want to pay more for IBM; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00359.html (13,857 bytes)
7. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: Stephen Comiskey <stephen.comiskey AT NOTES.ROYALSUN DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:57:05 +0100; We use Fuji tapes as well, in fact I understand that IBM tapes are re-badged Fuji. Maybe someone out there knows for sure. regards Stephen Dublin , Ireland "Cardoza, George" To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST D; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00360.html (16,099 bytes)
8. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: Tom Kauffman <KauffmanT AT NIBCO DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:22:31 -0500; For what it's worth, we brought in 380 tapes with our library two years ago. They were all Fuji tapes. We haven't had any problems with them that couldn't be traced back to drive or drive firmware is; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00377.html (13,660 bytes)
9. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: Shawn Price <sprice AT MORRISONHOMES DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:29:56 -0400; Mark, For what it's worth, my boss cheaped out and got some non IBM tapes for our 3584, and I've had nothing but problems with them. Mostly Imation and a few Emtecs. We are running the first generati; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00381.html (13,522 bytes)
10. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: Dan Foster <dsf AT GBLX DOT NET>; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:59:27 +0000; Hot Diggety! Shawn Price was rumored to have written: Make sure your library and drives are at the latest firmware revision levels -- this is especially important since more recent firmware revs fixe; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00382.html (12,856 bytes)
11. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: Stephen Comiskey <stephen.comiskey AT NOTES.ROYALSUN DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:12:24 +0100; Hi, As well as having the latest firmware, IBM have recently issued a small plastic clip for LTO1 drives. We were having problems with tapes ejecting (both IBM and non-IBM) and this helped resolve it; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00384.html (16,011 bytes)
12. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: Shawn Price <sprice AT MORRISONHOMES DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:21:15 -0400; Stephen, Was there some kind of announcement from IBM about this? I just had a tape drive replaced yesterday (LTO-1) because the tape was stuck (The changer couldn't remove it but I could wiggle it a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00391.html (17,470 bytes)
13. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: "Anderson F. Nobre" <afnobre AT UOL.COM DOT BR>; Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 00:05:27 -0300; I know a client that has bought Imation tapes and when they have used the tape cartridges they jamed into the drive units. Regards, Anderson we've been running IBM tapes but we've gotten cheaper pric; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00396.html (13,409 bytes)
14. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: "Coats, Jack" <Jack.Coats AT BANKSTERLING DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:35:52 -0500; I know this was a different unit, but we have a 3583. Sometime back we had to do a microcode upgrade AND replace all the internal slots in the library because evidently the NON-IBM Brand LTOs are sli; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00397.html (14,558 bytes)
15. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: Pauline Haines <pauline.haines AT ELYZIUM.CO DOT UK>; Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:58:29 +0100; We have experienced problems using HP tapes in 3584. I know a client that has bought Imation tapes and when they have used the tape cartridges they jamed into the drive units. Regards, Anderson we've; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00404.html (13,771 bytes)
16. Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584 (score: 1): Author: "Levinson, Donald A." <dlevinso AT ACSALASKA DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:26:35 -0800; We use the Fujifilm tapes and have great luck with them, our library is an ADIC Scalar 1000 (ADIC Scalar 100 is what the IBM 3583 is in real life), our drives are IBM 3580 drives. We tried the Graham; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00534.html (15,557 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]