Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Need\s+your\s+thoughts\s+on\s+best\s+RESTORE\s+approach\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Need\s+your\s+thoughts\s+on\s+best\s+RESTORE\s+approach\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Need your thoughts on best RESTORE approach (score: 1): Author: "MC Matt Cooper (2838)" <Matt.Cooper AT AMGREETINGS DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:47:24 -0400; Hello all, We backup an ORACLE ERP that is about 350GB. We back it up by running a script that uses 16 concurrent sessions, each one backing up a series of File Systems, all sesions going to disk poo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-06/msg00599.html (11,491 bytes)
2. Re: Need your thoughts on best RESTORE approach (score: 1): Author: Robert R Price <rprice28 AT CSC DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:41:02 -0400; You may want to consider defining a separate storage pool heirarchy for each of your 16 concurrent sessions (or split between 8 or ?). That way each disk pool would migrate to a different tape pool a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-06/msg00601.html (13,275 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]