Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NT\s+Cluster\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NT\s+Cluster\s+Question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: NT Cluster Question (score: 1): Author: Jim Smith <spikes AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 17:36:14 -0800; IBM response to NT cluster question: place? seen IBM's recommendation is to configure ADSM locally on both nodes of the cluster to take care of the local drives, and configure a third instance of the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg00028.html (12,697 bytes)
2. NT Cluster Question (score: 1): Author: Alan White <arw AT TIPPER.DEMON.CO DOT UK>; Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 16:12:28 -0500; Anybody running the ADSM client on an NT cluster? I would like the shared filesystem to be backed up by the active node by declaring an ADSM node responsible solely for the shared filesystem. The pla; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00911.html (11,363 bytes)
3. Re: NT Cluster Question (score: 1): Author: "John M. Sorensen" <sorensen AT STORSOL DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 15:15:34 -0700; In regards to #2; unfortunately the introduction of UNC naming does result in a given device being seen as two different filespaces, depending on which of the two machines in the cluster is backing i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00912.html (10,691 bytes)
4. NT Cluster Question (score: 1): Author: Alan White [SMTP:arw AT TIPPER.DEMON.CO DOT UK]; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:50:04 -0500; Anybody running the ADSM client on an NT cluster? I would like the shared filesystem to be backed up by the active node by declaring an ADSM node responsible solely for the shared filesystem. The pla; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00913.html (11,348 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]