Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NDMP\s+TOC\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+TSM\s+5\.3\s+new\s+goody$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NDMP\s+TOC\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+TSM\s+5\.3\s+new\s+goody$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: NDMP TOC (was Re: TSM 5.3 new goody) (score: 1): Author: Iain Barnetson <Iain.Barnetson AT HALLIBURTON DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 09:22:56 +0100; Ben, I've been doing TSM NDMP backups of a pair of clustered FAS940's since January. I'm using TSM 5.2.4.1 and Data OnTap 7.0.0.1. So far I've not had any problems really, only some minor things to w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-04/msg00000.html (12,803 bytes)
2. NDMP TOC (was Re: TSM 5.3 new goody) (score: 1): Author: Curtis Stewart <Curtis.Stewart AT LAWSON DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:47:08 -0600; Anyone know how to estimate the size required for a TOC? I'm looking at NDPM for our filer, that has about 3 million files. curtis.stewart AT lawson DOT com; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-03/msg00716.html (11,603 bytes)
3. Re: NDMP TOC (was Re: TSM 5.3 new goody) (score: 1): Author: Ben Bullock <bbullock AT MICRON DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:03:08 -0700; Hmm, I haven't seen a good rule-of-thumb for the TOC. Perhaps others who are using it more can address this. In my limited testing, I sometimes get a TOC much larger than I would expect on qtrees wit; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-03/msg00717.html (11,091 bytes)
4. Re: NDMP TOC (was Re: TSM 5.3 new goody) (score: 1): Author: Ben Bullock <bbullock AT MICRON DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:40:32 -0700; Just a quick update on our NDMP/TSM implementation we have been working on: RECAP - We were attempting to get NDMP to work with TSM, at the qtree level (as opposed to the whole volume) and get a TOC; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-03/msg00965.html (12,555 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]