Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Moving\s+Netview\s+behind\s+a\s+Cisco\s+PIX\s+Firewall\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Moving Netview behind a Cisco PIX Firewall (score: 1)
Author: "Tesfai, Menghis" <Menghis.Tesfai AT PictureVision DOT com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 12:40:18 -0400
Hello, Has anyone gone through the exercise of moving Netview behind a firewall. I am currently running Netview V5 on a Solaris 2.6 machine. If you could guide me to a URL or send me some documentati
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-05/msg00285.html (11,278 bytes)

2. Re: Moving Netview behind a Cisco PIX Firewall (score: 1)
Author: chuynh AT fr.ibm DOT com
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:39:05 +0200
Yes. We have a NV 6.2 on AIX server that manages CheckPoint Firewall-1, Cisco PIX, Cisco Catalyst and Alteon AD4. It works fine. As it is a touchy topic, may you be more precise on your request ? Chu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-05/msg00295.html (12,819 bytes)

3. RE: Moving Netview behind a Cisco PIX Firewall (score: 1)
Author: "Tesfai, Menghis" <Menghis.Tesfai AT PictureVision DOT com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 15:04:09 -0400
Let me restate my question. We are looking to change the IP address on the server that hosts Netview. If you could guide me to a URL or send me some documentation relating to this, I would appreciate
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-05/msg00311.html (13,003 bytes)

4. RE: Moving Netview behind a Cisco PIX Firewall (score: 1)
Author: chuynh AT fr.ibm DOT com
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 22:25:49 +0200
There are some guide lines: - Change the IP address of you NetView referenced in every managed node (trap) - Ask your firewall administrator to allow ping and snmp from your NetView server (any, NetV
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-05/msg00313.html (14,674 bytes)

5. Re: Moving Netview behind a Cisco PIX Firewall (score: 1)
Author: Dave Shiels <dshiels AT earthlink DOT net>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 14:06:26 -0700
Isolating the management network is the right thing to do. All traffic can run in the open and if you need to jump domains a good firewall system can be employed with what ever restriction. I love it
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-05/msg00314.html (15,914 bytes)

6. RE: Moving Netview behind a Cisco PIX Firewall (score: 1)
Author: "Leslie Clark" <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 07:04:57 -0400
Just on the subject of changing the IP Address of the Solaris box running Netview, take these things into consideration: See the Netview 6.0 release notes appendix B. The instructions there for chang
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-05/msg00319.html (15,913 bytes)

7. RE: Moving Netview behind a Cisco PIX Firewall (score: 1)
Author: reamd AT Nationwide DOT com
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 08:42:33 -0400
Leslie, Would changing the domain name be the same as changing the hostname? In other words, if you leave the name of the server alone but move it to a different domain, would you have the same affec
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-05/msg00320.html (17,582 bytes)

8. RE: Moving Netview behind a Cisco PIX Firewall (score: 1)
Author: "Leslie Clark" <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 09:36:57 -0400
The caveat is about changing the identity of the box as it is known to the Framework. You can change the domain, as long as the name resolution, as far as Framework and Netview know, is still the sam
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-05/msg00321.html (17,253 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu