Author: Bill Boyer <bill.boyer AT VERIZON DOT NET>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 16:44:21 -0400
Is it still the rule-of-thumb to NOT combine disk access and tape access across the same FC adapter? I have a client that doesn't want to purchase a separate adapter for the SAN tape backups to keep
Author: Chris Murphy <cmurphy AT IDL.STATE.ID DOT US>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 14:51:22 -0600
may occur if you mix the two, >>but has that changed with the advances in Fibre? Bill, We ran our disk and tape (both FC) on one adapter for about 7 months without issue. We recently purchased a sec
Author: Steve Harris <Steve_Harris AT HEALTH.QLD.GOV DOT AU>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:42:46 +1000
Bill, I ran for over a year on an SP node (F50 equivalent) single adapter to a shark and 3590 drives without problem. I've now moved to a P690 Lpar and because I have two sans, both connected to the
Have also got the impression from our local IBM support that the server would hang if we mixed shark and tape access on the same FC card. But due to lack of FC cards, some of our servers are running
Author: Gianluca Mariani1 <gianluca_mariani AT IT.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 11:51:13 +0200
This is our latest official statement concerning the FC HBA sharing issue.to my knowledge, it hasn't been "updated" yet. "...Using a single Fibre Channel host bus adapter (HBA) on a host server for c
Author: Antonio J Pires <antoniopires AT PT.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 12:07:25 +0100
FC adapter are configurable? How can I do that? Are they any receips for the best paranmetres? And on HP-UX 11.00 and 11.11 how can we tune FC for 3590 drives (throught 2109 SWs). Thanks in advance,