- 1. Mixed tapes in a 3494 library (score: 1)
- Author: mike_crawford AT TELUSPLANET DOT NET
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:23:42 GMT
- Hi, We are planning to use a mix of short and long length 3590 tapes in a single 3494 library. Some storage pools will use the short tapes for a 20gb capacity, others will use the long 40gb capacity.
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-08/msg00754.html (10,612 bytes)
- 2. Re: Mixed tapes in a 3494 library (score: 1)
- Author: Mark <rs6000 AT BTINTERNET DOT COM>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 23:06:50 +0100
- Mike this should not be a problem. I have done a similar thing on a 4mm tape libary using 60, 90 and 120M tapes and it worked without any problems. Mark
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-08/msg00758.html (10,415 bytes)
- 3. Re: Mixed tapes in a 3494 library (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:39:19 -0400
- Mike - I went through the same thing, and found it impossible. The problem is that the ADSM definitions boil down to having to dedicate drives to each scratch Category, which is not a viable option
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-08/msg00765.html (11,341 bytes)
- 4. Re: Mixed tapes in a 3494 library (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Faracchio <brother AT SOCRATES.BERKELEY DOT EDU>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:04:37 -0700
- What if your onsite-TAPEPOOL is one DEVCLass and your offsite-COPYPOOL is a different DEVClass? Combined with defining the library as two LiBR's with different private/scratch cataegories? .. joe.f.
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-08/msg00791.html (12,117 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu