Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Mirroring\s+vs\s+Raid5\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Mirroring\s+vs\s+Raid5\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Mirroring vs Raid5 (score: 1): Author: Jackie Balboni <JBALBONI AT OCEANSPRAY DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 09:55:36 -0500; At this time storage resources are a problem. We are Raid5 (EMC) and we have database and recovery log mirroring. Is this redundant?. Could we safely delete our mirrors and use the space for the logs; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01330.html (10,248 bytes)
2. Re: Mirroring vs Raid5 (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Michael Bruewer" <bruewer AT UNI-HOHENHEIM DOT DE>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:17:27 +0100; Hello, if all db- and log-mirrors are on the same RAID5 disk set, mirroring is redundant. If something should happen to this disk set, both mirrors are affected. However, one could imagine a rare sit; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01366.html (11,272 bytes)
3. Re: Mirroring vs Raid5 (score: 1): Author: Luuk Kleibrink <luuk_kleibrink AT DELTALLOYD DOT NL>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:09:28 +0100; We stopped mirroring when we upgraded our dasd from 3390 to Ramac Virtual Array which uses Raid technology. In short, yes, mirroring on a raid5 device is redundant. You're sufficiently protected agai; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01370.html (10,311 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]