- 1. MIB table is bad (score: 1)
- Author: michael.hamm AT tudor DOT lu
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:05:23 +0100
- I follow the documentation of CISCO to install the latest CISCO MIB on my NetView 5.1.1. They explain: "Following is a list of MIBs from which many other MIBs import definitions and the order in whic
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2000-11/msg00164.html (11,096 bytes)
- 2. Re: MIB table is bad (score: 1)
- Author: James_Shanks AT tivoli DOT com
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:15:31 -0500
- First of all, there have been MANY fixes to the SNMP V2 MIB loader since 5.1.1 and you will need to be on at leats 5.13 if you expect this to work. 5.1.1 is not current. Second, not everything Cisco
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2000-11/msg00165.html (11,938 bytes)
- 3. Re: MIB table is bad (score: 1)
- Author: James_Shanks AT tivoli DOT com
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:30:44 -0500
- That should read "at least 5.1.3" and I think you may still need to call Support about obtining an e-fix if one of your MIBs uses the BITS construct. James Shanks Team Leader, Level 3 Support Tivoli
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2000-11/msg00166.html (12,656 bytes)
- 4. Re: MIB table is bad (score: 1)
- Author: michael.hamm AT tudor DOT lu
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:31:53 +0100
- I like to upgrade to 5.1.3, but nobody help me out. I ask at IBM, at Tivoli and at my local trader since 8 weeks but nobody is able to support me the patch. Normaly I have to recive it for free but i
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2000-11/msg00187.html (14,742 bytes)
- 5. Re: MIB table is bad (score: 1)
- Author: James_Shanks AT tivoli DOT com
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:30:16 -0500
- I cannot guarantee this will get you results. Your local IBM/Tivoli office is supposed to be able to place an order for you and see that you get it. So personally, I would call them up and complain l
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2000-11/msg00221.html (14,771 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu