Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MAXSIZE\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MAXSIZE\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. MAXSIZE (score: 1): Author: Remco Post <r.post AT SARA DOT NL>; Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:00:53 +0100; Hi all, I'm a bit confused, so I was hoping maybe the list could help. When I read the help on def stg/upd stg for the Maxsi parameter it mentionses two things: 1- It's the size of the physical file; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-03/msg00283.html (11,577 bytes)
2. Re: MAXSIZE (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:06:17 -0500; Hi all, I'm a bit confused, so I was hoping maybe the list could help. When I read the help on def stg/upd stg for the Maxsi parameter it mentionses two things: 1- It's the size of the physical file; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-03/msg00288.html (12,254 bytes)
3. Re: MAXSIZE (score: 1): Author: Remco Post <r.post AT SARA DOT NL>; Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:24:31 +0100; Well, actually, I can inmagine the TSM server allocating the destenation resource on a per file basis even for B/A client backups. This I get, not from any redbook, but both the quickfacts and 'help; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-03/msg00297.html (14,913 bytes)
4. Re: MAXSIZE (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:44:27 -0500; Well, actually, I can inmagine the TSM server allocating the destenation resource on a per file basis even for B/A client backups. This I get, not from any redbook, but both the quickfacts and 'help; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-03/msg00305.html (13,843 bytes)
5. Re: MAXSIZE (score: 1): Author: Remco Post <r.post AT SARA DOT NL>; Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 23:55:49 +0100; thanks, will look into that, again. I wasn't really impressed by the clarity of the chapters when I read them, just yesterday ;-) ok, let's make this clear beyond any doubt: I don't care either way,; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-03/msg00309.html (15,358 bytes)
6. Re: MAXSIZE (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 19:19:26 -0500; So now for the question at hand, how do aggregation and the maxsize parameter interact? Both during B/A and migration/reclamation? Remco - There's no mystery in this - it's all laid out in the IBM d; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-03/msg00312.html (11,683 bytes)
7. Re: MAXSIZE (score: 1): Author: Remco Post <r.post AT SARA DOT NL>; Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:15:42 +0100; Thanks, and of course, since the landing area is determined before the actual start of the data-transfer, in filesystem sizes are used to determine the expected size of the transaction during b/a act; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-03/msg00315.html (13,215 bytes)
8. MaxSize (score: 1): Author: Mahesh Tailor <MTailor AT CARILION DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:29:50 -0400; I have a disk-based pool of 92GB with the MAXSIZEthreshold set to 700M and the next storage pool set to my tapepool which has this parameter set to NO LIMIT. I have a few NetWare clients that have fi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00750.html (11,702 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]