Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Linux\s+vs\.\s+Windows\s+TSM\s+servers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Linux\s+vs\.\s+Windows\s+TSM\s+servers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Linux vs. Windows TSM servers (score: 1): Author: Bruce Tamulis <TAMULISB AT TRINITY-HEALTH DOT ORG>; Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:07:37 -0400; Can the upper management get any more vague with their request? Throughput of what, data being backed up...data being restored...what? Personally, my concerns lay in Disaster Recovery, because that's; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-09/msg00255.html (11,796 bytes)
2. Linux vs. Windows TSM servers (score: 1): Author: "Dennis, Melburn W IT743" <melburn.dennis AT SIEMENS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:07:28 -0400; My upper management has asked that I compare the performance of a Linux-based TSM server to a Windows-based one in terms of throughput. We currently use Windows TSM servers. Before I start doing any; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-05/msg00311.html (10,858 bytes)
3. Re: Linux vs. Windows TSM servers (score: 1): Author: Bruce Tamulis <TAMULISB AT TRINITY-HEALTH DOT ORG>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:41:27 -0400; Can the upper management get any more vague with their request? Throughput of what, data being backed up...data being restored...what? Personally, my concerns lay in Disaster Recovery, because that's; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-05/msg00313.html (12,001 bytes)
4. Re: Linux vs. Windows TSM servers (score: 1): Author: Stef Coene <stef.coene AT DOCUM DOT ORG>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:57:17 +0200; I think it's not so much about throughput, but about management and Disaster Recovery. In case of a disaster, it's much easier to rebuild a linux server then a windows server. If you use currently wi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-05/msg00314.html (11,128 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]