Author: Taylor Mitchell <taylor_mitchell AT MSN DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 22:10:19 -0400
While much of the discussion in this forum has focused on backup performance issues, another issue that is perhaps even more important is restore performance. In particular, as servers have become mo
Taylor, We are asking ourselves the same question: is ADSM really a backup product designed for clients with big disks (more than 10GB)? We are facing exactly the same problems plus one: the restore
Author: "Smith, Richard" <smithrr AT MARITZ DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 08:45:55 -0500
I have to agree. We've had some pretty upset users here. Waiting hours to restore one small file is ridiculous to them!! Rick Smith Maritz, Inc. Storage & Security Administration smithrr AT maritz DO
Author: Dave Crockett <crockett AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 10:07:07 -0400
As mentioned previously, for this case you should see some great improvements when you get the changes made for APAR PQ05614. This was a server change is in the most recent server PTFs. Dave Crockett
Author: "Schauerte, Andrew P (NM75)" <andrew.schauerte AT DAS.HONEYWELL DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 09:05:00 -0600
Hello ADSM'ers We have had some major problems with restore performance with ADSM V2. We had just upgraded to V3 and we are starting a test restore today. V3 of ADSM skips the examining of files and
Author: Taylor Mitchell[SMTP:taylor_mitchell AT MSN DOT COM]
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:59:02 -0500
While much of the discussion in this forum has focused on backup performance issues, another issue that is perhaps even more important is restore performance. In particular, as servers have become mo
We are just getting into larger NT machines as you described and are also looking for "tricks" to improve restore performance. I'm a NT novice at best, but its seems as though restore performance on
Author: "Mercer, K. (Kevin)" <KEVIN.MERCER AT ROYALBANK DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 11:37:00 -0400
Hello, response to Adsm Restore problems. Environment: Adsm V3 Server Aix 4.2, Adsm V3 client NT V4, 100 mb/ ethernet network. We are seeing a problem with very similar issues. Our problem is the slo
In <c=US%a=_%p=esys%l=GVLMAIL1-980423155023Z-5219 AT gvlmail1.gvl.esys DOT The apar number is different for different versions and platforms. The fix is available for version 3 mvs as PQ13256. I have
Author: Rejean Larivee <rlarivee AT CA.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 13:53:09 -0400
Hello, indeed, the ptf for PQ05614 is not yet available. This is the apar for V2. The apar for V3 is PQ13256 and is fixed at the 3.1.0.2 level which is available via the following ptfs : UQ16498, UQ1
ADSM dev., I would be very happy if there was also a PTF for ADSM server MVS 2.1. Until today (24/04/1998), there is no PTF associated with APAR PQ05614 for MVS ADSM 2,1!!!! Francis. --Message d'orig