Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LTO4\s+amtapetype\s+problem\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LTO4\s+amtapetype\s+problem\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. LTO4 amtapetype problem? (score: 1): Author: Jean-Francois Malouin <malin AT bic.mni.mcgill DOT ca>; Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:27:42 -0400; Hi, Not really an Amanda question but I'll try anyway... I can't get better than ~60MiBs to LTO4 tape when using amtapetype. I tried 32k 1024k and 2048k, with and without hw compression enabled. Any; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-06/msg00050.html (12,199 bytes)
2. Re: LTO4 amtapetype problem? (score: 1): Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>; Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:45:58 -0400; 60 MiB/s is certainly capable of hitting a number of hardware bottlenecks - RAM, SCSI, PCI bus, even CPU when generating random data. You may want to try a simpler test with just 'dd' from e.g, /dev/; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-06/msg00051.html (11,690 bytes)
3. Re: LTO4 amtapetype problem? (score: 1): Author: Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>; Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:44:59 -0400; Not really an Amanda question but I'll try anyway... I can't get better than ~60MiBs to LTO4 tape when using amtapetype. I tried 32k 1024k and 2048k, with and without hw compression enabled. Any hint; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-06/msg00052.html (13,968 bytes)
4. Re: LTO4 amtapetype problem? (score: 1): Author: Jean-Francois Malouin <malin AT bic.mni.mcgill DOT ca>; Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:11:22 -0400; * Dustin J. Mitchell <dustin AT zmanda DOT com> [20090612 11:47]: I have a exact clone of that library with same LTO4 drives and I can routinely achieve ~100MiBs on that server. This server is newer; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-06/msg00054.html (13,020 bytes)
5. Re: LTO4 amtapetype problem? (score: 1): Author: Jean-Francois Malouin <malin AT bic.mni.mcgill DOT ca>; Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:19:45 -0400; * Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu> [20090612 11:46]: I'll give that a try. Yes I did assume that. As I wrote to Dustin this host used to do better than that with LTO3s, in fact I coul; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-06/msg00055.html (15,382 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]