Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LTO2\s+Drive\s+\/\s+Linux\s+anyone\s+\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. LTO2 Drive / Linux anyone ? (score: 1)
Author: Guy Dallaire <clepeterd AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:47:51 -0500
We're curently using a 5 slot DLT IV tape changer. I'm getting an increased amount of errors and the tape drive is quite old now. We're considering the purchase of s single LTO2 drive. We're using am
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00168.html (11,369 bytes)

2. Re: LTO2 Drive / Linux anyone ? (score: 1)
Author: Matt Hyclak <hyclak AT math.ohiou DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:13:11 -0500
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 03:47:51PM -0500, Guy Dallaire enlightened us: I'm using RHEL3 at the moment with 2.4.5p1 and a Centrance (now Quantum) 1U rackmount LTO2 drive. It's got room for a second dri
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00169.html (12,140 bytes)

3. Re: LTO2 Drive / Linux anyone ? (score: 1)
Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:30:08 -0500
That 1.14-* is a zinger for most folks, use 1.15-1 or 1.13-19 or 1.13-25 for best results. -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word 'online' between the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00172.html (12,108 bytes)

4. Re: LTO2 Drive / Linux anyone ? (score: 1)
Author: Matt Hyclak <hyclak AT math.ohiou DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:35:39 -0500
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:30:08PM -0500, Gene Heskett enlightened us: The 1.14 included in RHEL4 should be ok. See http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html When dealing with RHEL (or CentOS
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00173.html (12,152 bytes)

5. Re: LTO2 Drive / Linux anyone ? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:30:36 +0100
Guy Dallaire schreef: We're curently using a 5 slot DLT IV tape changer. I'm getting an increased amount of errors and the tape drive is quite old now. We're considering the purchase of s single LTO2
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00178.html (12,852 bytes)

6. Re: LTO2 Drive / Linux anyone ? (score: 1)
Author: Graeme Humphries <graeme.humphries AT vcom DOT com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:45:31 -0600
I would like to know if any of you is using a similar OS for the amanda server, having succes with LTO2 drives and the drive manufacturer/model you are using. We're using an LTO2 and an LTO3 changer
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00180.html (11,773 bytes)

7. Re: LTO2 Drive / Linux anyone ? (score: 1)
Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:06:46 -0500
On eBay there are tons of bare IBM drives listed. Not sure if this a good or bad thing :) Feasible/difficult to put one of these into a generic scsi case? Some of the IBM drives are listed as Fiber C
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00183.html (11,952 bytes)

8. Re: LTO2 Drive / Linux anyone ? (score: 1)
Author: Graeme Humphries <graeme.humphries AT vcom DOT com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:12:33 -0600
On eBay there are tons of bare IBM drives listed. Not sure if this a good or bad thing :) Probably just an availability thing. Feasible/difficult to put one of these into a generic scsi case? I imag
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00184.html (12,363 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu