- 1. JR- Client Option set vs dsm.opt (sys) (score: 1)
- Author: JR Trimark <j.r.trimark AT AURORA DOT ORG>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:38:19 -0600
- We are debating whether or not to use client option sets in addition to the dsm.opt file. A little history is needed for discussion sake: We are backing up data only, which is typically on another dr
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-03/msg00287.html (11,088 bytes)
- 2. Re: JR- Client Option set vs dsm.opt (sys) (score: 1)
- Author: Daniel Sparrman <Daniel.Sparrman AT EXIST DOT SE>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:42:45 +0100
- Using only thoose options would make the difference between using client optionsets and dsm.opt entries fairly small due to the fact all of thoose options are static ones. I always use client options
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-03/msg00288.html (12,362 bytes)
- 3. Re: JR- Client Option set vs dsm.opt (sys) (score: 1)
- Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:43:51 -0500
- If it's easy for you to log in and set up the dsm.opt files for your servers, that's fine. In the case of someone whose clients are geographically scattered, and/or they don't have administration rig
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-03/msg00297.html (12,216 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu