Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+there\s+a\s+TSM\s+version\s+that\s+\"audit\s+vol\s+fix\=yes\"\s+actually\s+fixe\s+s\s+something\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+there\s+a\s+TSM\s+version\s+that\s+\"audit\s+vol\s+fix\=yes\"\s+actually\s+fixe\s+s\s+something\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Is there a TSM version that "audit vol fix=yes" actually fixe s something? (score: 1): Author: Mark Bertrand <Mark.Bertrand AT USUNWIRED DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:26:29 -0600; Thanks Davide, this is exactly what I am doing. It's good to hear confirmation on the resolution path. But, my original question and still is, is that why didn't the audit work? It's just frustrating; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-03/msg00269.html (14,247 bytes)
2. Re: Is there a TSM version that "audit vol fix=yes" actually fixe s something? (score: 1): Author: Mark Bertrand <Mark.Bertrand AT USUNWIRED DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:54:07 -0600; Now that you mentioned it, it has happened twice for that media on the same drive. I will look into specifing a particular drive in the future. I have six drives and I have never tried to specify a p; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-03/msg00280.html (14,190 bytes)
3. Re: Is there a TSM version that "audit vol fix=yes" actually fixe s something? (score: 1): Author: Nicholas Cassimatis <nickpc AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:09:39 -0500; Mark, That's an easy one - take the drive in question offline, and TSM won't use it for the audit process. Nick Cassimatis nickpc AT us.ibm DOT com Think twice, type once. Mark Bertrand <Mark.Bertran; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-03/msg00304.html (12,096 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]