Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Incorect\s+retention\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Incorect\s+retention\.\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Incorect retention. (score: 1): Author: ANGEL BUGARIN <ANGEL.BUGARIN AT MAIL.SPRINT DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:07:23 -0800; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00751.html (10,346 bytes)
2. Re: Incorect retention. (score: 1): Author: "Cook, Dwight E" <cookde AT BP DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:00:51 -0500; What adsm server version ? Prior to .40 there was a little deal where DIRECTORY PATHS were archived into the longest retention archive management class that existed under the client's domain. The .40; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00753.html (12,891 bytes)
3. Re: Incorect retention. (score: 1): Author: ANGEL BUGARIN <ANGEL.BUGARIN AT MAIL.SPRINT DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:56:09 -0800; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00755.html (10,401 bytes)
4. Re: Incorect retention. (score: 1): Author: "Cook, Dwight E" <cookde AT BP DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 16:12:09 -0500; Nope, I wouldn't upgrade to .40 ! it has some "hang" bugs and from what I've been reading about .50 you don't want that either. I'm waiting on (I guess) .60 Dwight; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00764.html (15,240 bytes)
5. Re: Incorect retention. (score: 1): Author: ANGEL BUGARIN <ANGEL.BUGARIN AT MAIL.SPRINT DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:21:48 -0800; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00766.html (10,353 bytes)
6. Re: Incorect retention. (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 07:51:32 -0500; Dwight - Let me understand this... You're waiting for a release of *SM with no defects??? ;-) Richard Sims, BU; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00792.html (10,666 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]