- 1. Hypothetical Question (score: 1)
- Author: Chris Cowan <chris.cowan AT 2ND-WAVE DOT COM>
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 17:58:11 -0500
- Scenario: A multi machine AIX 4.3.1 HACMP cluster. Machine 1 - TMR 3.6 Server Machine 2 - TEC 3.6 Server Machine 3 - Netview 5.1 Tivoli Filesystems (/usr/local/Tivoli, /var/spool/Tivoli). Endpoints p
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00070.html (13,381 bytes)
- 2. Re: Hypothetical Question (score: 1)
- Author: Gast <gast AT MUS DOT DE>
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 13:40:33 +0100
- Hi Chris, there is no problem for NetView to start at a new "Managed Node", but you get a problem if you want to configere it or to update/install/deinstall it. NetView dosn't need the Framework afte
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00083.html (13,713 bytes)
- 3. Re: Hypothetical Question (score: 1)
- Author: "MENEZES, ALAIN" <a.menezes AT ASLK-CGER DOT BE>
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 13:57:23 +0100
- Hi, What should be the relationship between NetView Server 5.1 & Tivoli TMR ? NV should be TMR ? ... ? Anyone please explain. -- Alain Menezes ASLK-CGER Services GIE Tel.: +32 2 228.55.74 Rue Fossé-a
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00084.html (14,956 bytes)
- 4. Re: Hypothetical Question (score: 1)
- Author: James Shanks <James_Shanks AT TIVOLI DOT COM>
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 10:42:50 -0500
- I'd consider having another NetView as a backup before I would do anything this complex. Then you could configure the agents to send traps to both NetViews, which would save lots of time. And you wou
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00096.html (14,804 bytes)
- 5. Re: Hypothetical Question (score: 1)
- Author: Sergio Cardona F <sergcafe AT MAIL.VISIONTECH.COM DOT CO>
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 11:10:10 -0500
- Hi Chris: We have a multimachine AIX 4.2.1 HACMP cluster. We make the things in this way: Machine 1 TMR 3.6 Machine 2 NetView 5.1 Machine 3 TEC Machine 4 Another application M1 is the pair of M2 and
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00098.html (15,721 bytes)
- 6. Re: Hypothetical Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Ken Garst." <KGarst AT GIANTOFMARYLAND DOT COM>
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 14:19:57 -0500
- I am in the middle of testing a two-node cascading HACMP 4.3 cluster under AIX 4.3.2 with Netview 5.1 and Tivoli framework 3.6 as highly available resources. The other cascading resource group is the
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00104.html (12,528 bytes)
- 7. Re: Hypothetical Question (score: 1)
- Author: James Shanks <James_Shanks AT TIVOLI DOT COM>
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 16:29:44 -0500
- Ken - That's a well-thought-out and well-executed HACMP setup. Don't think I have ever seen better. And I think that it will work just fine if you can get a fix for those authentication errors. Good
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00107.html (13,649 bytes)
- 8. Re: Hypothetical Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Ken Garst." <KGarst AT GIANTOFMARYLAND DOT COM>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 09:53:35 -0500
- Thanks for the kind words about the HACMP setup. Of course you are absolutely correct about the two-host Netview setup facilitating training and upkeep by operational personnel. The HACMP cluster adm
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00155.html (11,821 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu