Author: Ken Sedlacek <Ken_Sedlacek AT KYRUS DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:03:48 -0400
For TSM AIX only. I just recently saw the IBM web site on AIX SysBack System Backup and Recovery program. Can someone who either knows both, or uses both of them, point out the differences/similariti
Author: David Stabler <dstabler AT MORRISONHOMES DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:25:36 -0400
Um....they both use tapes? That's about where it stops.... SysBack/6000 uses a shell wrapper to the backupvg command, just like mksysb does. It allows you to build bootable, installable, and recovera
Author: "Johnn D. Tan" <jdtan AT MED.CORNELL DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:47:38 -0400
Well, I can't say I'm an "expert" on either, but having done both, I will say this: sysback only backs up rootvg, AFAIK. Plus, it's better if files are not changing when it happens, so we always boot
Author: Hamish Marson <hamish AT TRAVELLINGKIWI DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:39:47 +0100
For TSM AIX only. I just recently saw the IBM web site on AIX SysBack System Backup and Recovery program. Can someone who either knows both, or uses both of them, point out the differences/similarit
Author: Mark Stapleton <stapleto AT BERBEE DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:06:41 -0500
Sysback is a nicely robust backup solution for AIX-based boxes. It will create a bootable tape containing backups for one or more volume groups. It is superior to mksysb in that sysback can back up m
Author: Justin Bleistein <justin.bleistein AT SUNGARD DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 10:28:45 -0400
yeah, sysback is for bare metal restores of your system images, tsm is for user data. --Justin Ken Sedlacek <Ken_Sedlacek@KYR To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU US.COM> cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: How