Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Got\s+a\s+bug\,\s+what\s+can\s+I\s+do\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Got\s+a\s+bug\,\s+what\s+can\s+I\s+do\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Got a bug, what can I do? (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:03:00 -0500; Greetings; I have found what I believe is a bug in amrestore, as it is used for an amverify run. Last night I set everything up for generating what should be a pristine vtape. When I awoke, amrestore; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-11/msg00258.html (12,566 bytes)
2. Re: Got a bug, what can I do? (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:01:39 -0500; I didn't test the 1116 snapshot after reading the ChangeLog, but re-installed the 2.4.5b1-20041110 snapshot, and the amrestore problem is gone. This goes to prove the when you run bleeding edge stuff; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-11/msg00259.html (13,408 bytes)
3. Re: Got a bug, what can I do? (score: 1): Author: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <monitor AT oops.co DOT at>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:56:52 +0100; Hi, Gene, on Mittwoch, 17. November 2004 at 22:01 you wrote to amanda-users: No need to say then that it would be interesting to check this behavior with 2.4.4p4. He is the one to notify, yes ;-) Gla; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-11/msg00260.html (11,236 bytes)
4. Re: Got a bug, what can I do? (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:08:13 -0500; Chuckle, maybe. But then I tend to stay a little closer to the quick. While I'm posting to this relatively quiet list, those who tend to treat linux as a community thing, should go read the /. story; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-11/msg00261.html (12,193 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]