Author: "Caffey, Jeff L." <jlcaffey AT PIER1 DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:30:43 -0600
Can somebody help me...? We are in the process of implementing TSM, an IBM Shark, and a SAN all at the same time (I'm swamped)! We are replacing EMC's Data Manager, an EMC Symmetrix, and Veritas' Bac
Author: Carl Makin <carl AT XENA.IPAUSTRALIA.GOV DOT AU>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:46:13 +1100
We moved our 120Gb disk backup pool from a SSA D40 drawer (RAID5) to the Shark and got an order of magnitude improvement in backup times. 40Gb NOTES backups went from 20 hours to 4 hours. The shark o
Author: Suad Musovich <suad AT CCU1.AUCKLAND.AC DOT NZ>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:40:24 +1300
file level. byte-level backup (adaptive subfile backup) requires a client overhead which would not be suitable for server situation. It was designed client machines with irregular connections (eg. la
I believe this is controlled by the USEUNICODEFILENAMES parameter. I am not certain, (test it yourself), but you would need to set up two clients on your server, one DSM.OPT containing USEUNICODEFIL
Author: John Monahan <JohnMonahan AT LIBERTYDIVERSIFIED DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:19:53 -0600
I have around 5 servers with a mixture of NT and Mac files, and I only use one client per server with the "useunicodef yes" option. The success of backing up Mac files also depends on your client cod