Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Expected\s+completion\s+of\s+an\s+\"add\s+\*\"\s+for\s+a\s+DLE\s+with\s+378k\s+files\s+\(2\.4\.4p3\)\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Expected completion of an "add *" for a DLE with 378k files (2.4.4p3)? (score: 1)
Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:36:58 -0400
Can't answer your question, but as a workaround might you do an "add ." , or possibly cd up one level and "add dirname" ? -- Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-09/msg00069.html (11,720 bytes)

2. Re: Expected completion of an "add *" for a DLE with 378k files (2.4.4p3)? (score: 1)
Author: Jean-Louis Martineau <martineau AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:07:39 -0400
2.4.? and early 2.5.? can become extremely slow because in some case, the index are not sorted correctly. A 'add .' might be faster than a 'add *', but I'm not sure. Jean-Louis I have a DLE with more
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-09/msg00070.html (13,190 bytes)

3. Expected completion of an "add *" for a DLE with 378k files (2.4.4p3)? (score: 1)
Author: Francis Galiegue <fg AT one2team DOT com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:47:41 +0200
Hello again! I have a DLE with more than 378k files in it (that's not a joke), I'm trying to restore it using (again) amrecover. The DLE is found without a hitch, however, it's been now 30 minutes th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-09/msg00072.html (12,648 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu