Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Does\s+subfile\s+backup\s+reduce\s+tape\s+occupancy\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Does\s+subfile\s+backup\s+reduce\s+tape\s+occupancy\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Does subfile backup reduce tape occupancy? (score: 1): Author: Tab Trepagnier <Tab.Trepagnier AT LAITRAM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 08:54:35 -0600; Like lots of users, our tape libraries are overloaded and we're looking for ways to reduce what we're keeping before spending money on new equipment. Server: TSM 5.1.10 on AIX 5.2 Clients: mostly TSM; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-11/msg00101.html (10,959 bytes)
2. Re: Does subfile backup reduce tape occupancy? (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:12:21 -0500; HI Tab, I think "it depends". When I was using it, the answer was yes. What we used it for was squishing a lot of .pst files. They tended to be fairly large, up to 500m, and were excellent candidates; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-11/msg00112.html (13,414 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]