Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Discrepancy\s+between\s+standard\s+restore\s+and\s+restore\s+backupset\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Discrepancy\s+between\s+standard\s+restore\s+and\s+restore\s+backupset\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset (score: 1): Author: John Naylor <John.Naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 11:49:52 +0100; Am I missing something obvious? I am doing some comparison testing of backupset restores against standard restores. I understood that in both cases restore would only be of active files and yet I see; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-08/msg00786.html (13,245 bytes)
2. Re: Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset (score: 1): Author: "Barth, Terry V. (MBS)" <Terry.Barth AT MORTGAGEFAMILY DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 07:06:00 -0400; It looks like the larger restore containes both active and inactive, try adding -active to your restore line.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-08/msg00787.html (11,588 bytes)
3. Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset (score: 1): Author: John Naylor [mailto:John.Naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK]; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:28:41 -0500; Am I missing something obvious? I am doing some comparison testing of backupset restores against standard restores. I understood that in both cases restore would only be of active files and yet I see; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-08/msg00788.html (13,393 bytes)
4. Re: Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset (score: 1): Author: John Naylor <John.Naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 12:14:39 +0100; Terry, -active is not a documented option with the netware client restore command -inactive is an option(which seems to confirm that active is the default) -inactive is an option(which seems to confi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-08/msg00789.html (12,282 bytes)
5. Re: Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset (score: 1): Author: "Barth, Terry V. (MBS)" <Terry.Barth AT MORTGAGEFAMILY DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 07:29:17 -0400; Sorry - didn't have my book with me - I recall always using inactive and pick for the novell restores - we only have 5 novell servers, so novell restores are not in a high demand for us.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-08/msg00790.html (11,648 bytes)
6. Re: Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset (score: 1): Author: John Naylor [mailto:John.Naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK]; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:28:41 -0500; Terry, -active is not a documented option with the netware client restore command -inactive is an option(which seems to confirm that active is the default) -inactive is an option(which seems to confi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-08/msg00791.html (12,338 bytes)
7. Re: Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset (score: 1): Author: John Naylor <John.Naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 17:57:48 +0100; I am not sure if it was clear in my original note but ANE4955I (Session: 6894, Node: PORSD1) Total objects restored: 1,381,024 was the figure from the backup set restore. If anyone has seen this sort; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-08/msg00813.html (13,758 bytes)
8. Re: Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset (score: 1): Author: "Barth, Terry V. (MBS)" <Terry.Barth AT MORTGAGEFAMILY DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 08:43:49 -0400; Hi John - When you did the backupset, did you check the log? I have had in the past where not all the files would be backed up to the backupset - due to a problem with the file on the tape or a probl; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-08/msg00833.html (12,068 bytes)
9. Re: Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset (score: 1): Author: John Naylor [mailto:John.Naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK]; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:28:41 -0500; I am not sure if it was clear in my original note but ANE4955I (Session: 6894, Node: PORSD1) Total objects restored: 1,381,024 was the figure from the backup set restore. If anyone has seen this sort; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-08/msg00834.html (13,788 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]