Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Daily\s+Processing\s+Performance\s+\(very\s+slow\s+\-\s+any\s+ideas\?\)\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Daily Processing Performance (very slow - any ideas?) (score: 1)
Author: "Thach, Kevin" <KThach AT COVHLTH DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:47:17 -0500
I'm very dissapointed with the performance of our TSM environment, and I was curious what kinds of numbers some of you with similar environments have experienced. I've worked extensively with IBM to
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00250.html (14,388 bytes)

2. Re: Daily Processing Performance (very slow - any ideas?) (score: 1)
Author: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:13:56 -0500
I have a very similar environment. I don't have the ED-6064 in loop - yet. Have only One Non-coll disk pool on an IBM FAStT 200 HA used exclusively by TSM. Have 6H1 with 2 procs and 2GB RAM, have 8 F
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00253.html (16,994 bytes)

3. Re: Daily Processing Performance (very slow - any ideas?) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark D. Rodriguez" <mark AT MDRCONSULT DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:19:12 -0600
I'm very dissapointed with the performance of our TSM environment, and I was curious what kinds of numbers some of you with similar environments have experienced. I've worked extensively with IBM to
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00256.html (15,960 bytes)

4. Re: Daily Processing Performance (very slow - any ideas?) (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Sparrman <daniel.sparrman AT EXIST DOT SE>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:52:32 +0100
Hi How is your 660 configured? How many FC adapters are installed, and do you have 1 or 2 I/O drawers? How is the adapters placed within the I/O drawer(s)? Is the disk and tape connected through the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00261.html (15,241 bytes)

5. Re: Daily Processing Performance (very slow - any ideas?) (score: 1)
Author: "Thach, Kevin" <KThach AT COVHLTH DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 12:39:18 -0500
Okay, some of you have requested more info before trying to make a diagnosis, so let me give you some more details. The 500GB disk pool and the 250GB disk pool are on ESS--8GB vpaths. I have 144 of t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00267.html (19,159 bytes)

6. Re: Daily Processing Performance (very slow - any ideas?) (score: 1)
Author: "Seay, Paul" <seay_pd AT NAPTHEON DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:11:52 -0500
Are you using mirroring? If so, do not, waste of resources and lots of overhead on backup db. Are you using raw or JFS? There is absolutely no value defining such small LUNs on the ESS. In fact that
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00301.html (20,563 bytes)

7. Re: Daily Processing Performance (very slow - any ideas?) (score: 1)
Author: "Thach, Kevin" <KThach AT COVHLTH DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:47:39 -0500
We only use mirroring for rootvg. Anything on ESS we don't use mirroring for. We are using JFS. We have our TSM allocation on the ESS as follows: 144 LUNs allocated, 18 LUNS on 8 LSS's. We purchased
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00344.html (22,727 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu