Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DIRMC\s+stgpool\:\s+DISK\s+or\s+FILE\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DIRMC\s+stgpool\:\s+DISK\s+or\s+FILE\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. DIRMC stgpool: DISK or FILE? (score: 1): Author: Jurjen Oskam <jurjen-tsm AT STUPENDOUS DOT ORG>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:28:12 +0100; Hi there, I have a question about which devclass to use for a storagepool that is exclusively used as DIRMC destination. The server originally was set up with a large enough DIRPOOL of type DISK. Lat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00308.html (11,615 bytes)
2. Re: DIRMC stgpool: DISK or FILE? (score: 1): Author: "Stapleton, Mark" <mark.stapleton AT BERBEE DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 14:02:08 -0600; Storage pools that act as DIRMC management class destinations never grow to any size to speak of, and they contain redundant data; the normal client data destination pool also contains a copy of all; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00368.html (12,344 bytes)
3. Re: DIRMC stgpool: DISK or FILE? (score: 1): Author: Jurjen Oskam <jurjen-tsm AT STUPENDOUS DOT ORG>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:11:22 +0100; I wasn't aware of this. Is this documented somewhere? If this is the case, then why have a DIRMC stgpool at all? From ADSM.QuickFacts I've understood that in current TSM versions the restore process; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00376.html (12,077 bytes)
4. Re: DIRMC stgpool: DISK or FILE? (score: 1): Author: "Rushforth, Tim" <TRushforth AT WINNIPEG DOT CA>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:51:55 -0600; There was a problem at one time with offsite reclamation running slow when reading from disk (this was fixed a couple of years ago). If you had a DIRPOOL of type DISK only you would have suffered a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00394.html (13,073 bytes)
5. Re: DIRMC stgpool: DISK or FILE? (score: 1): Author: Jurjen Oskam <jurjen-tsm AT STUPENDOUS DOT ORG>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:43:39 +0059; I asked this here, because IBM support asked why we were using FILE volumes instead of DISK volumes for our DIRMC stgpool. He recommends DISK volumes, but only mentioned performance as a reason for t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00407.html (11,635 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]