Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DHCP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DHCP\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. DHCP (score: 1): Author: farukg AT us.ibm DOT com; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 08:36:33 -0700; Does anyone have or know where to get some standard ( or AIX specific ) MIBs for DHCP service? I'm running DHCP on AIX 4.3.2. The following link is to a document that is a proposal to make a RFC stan; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2000-03/msg00195.html (10,277 bytes)
2. DHCP (score: 1): Author: "Todd E. Lewis" <telewis AT PROVIDENTBANKMD DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:11:01 -0400; Has anyone been successful in putting in ranges in the seed file for dhcp and having the nodes discovered as dhcp ? Thus adding to DHCP smartset. I'm trying to do this so I can unmanage the smartset; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-05/msg00274.html (10,688 bytes)
3. Re: DHCP (score: 1): Author: Xu He <xuhe AT YAHOO DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:15:04 -0700; If you know the DHCP range and you don't want to manage the clients, shouldn't you just exclude the range from discovery. This way, it won't clutter you database. The sites I am managing uses the low; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-05/msg00282.html (11,582 bytes)
4. Re: DHCP (score: 1): Author: "Todd E. Lewis" <telewis AT PROVIDENTBANKMD DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 16:56:45 -0400; What is you get a workstation that is beaconing, do you need to have the workstation in the database in order to see this problem or is this trap that is unrelated? If you know the DHCP range and you; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-05/msg00283.html (11,887 bytes)
5. Re: DHCP (score: 1): Author: Xu He <xuhe AT YAHOO DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 05:33:08 -0700; If you get a workstation that's beaconing, chances are you whole Token Ring is temporarily out of commission. The only trap or event you should see should come out of the Token-ring interface of the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-05/msg00303.html (12,995 bytes)
6. Re: DHCP (score: 1): Author: "Todd E. Lewis" <telewis AT PROVIDENTBANKMD DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 13:01:46 -0400; Ok, thanks. If you get a workstation that's beaconing, chances are you whole Token Ring is temporarily out of commission. The only trap or event you should see should come out of the Token-ring inter; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-05/msg00312.html (13,160 bytes)
7. Re: DHCP (score: 1): Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 22:33:01 -0400; On both NT and on AIX I have successfully excluded DHCP nodes from being discovered at all by putting entries in the seedfile like this: If your ranges is 1.2.3.64 to 1.2.5.255 with class-c mask, use; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-05/msg00331.html (13,959 bytes)
8. Re: DHCP (score: 1): Author: "Todd E. Lewis" <telewis AT PROVIDENTBANKMD DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 07:55:33 -0400; Is there a problem with discovering dhcp clients as dhcp clients, in the seed file ? On both NT and on AIX I have successfully excluded DHCP nodes from being discovered at all by putting entries in t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-05/msg00342.html (14,167 bytes)
9. Re: DHCP (score: 1): Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 00:03:04 -0400; Not that I know of. It is documented that it works. I just have no use for them and so have not tested that function. But that is how you do it on NT. You put them in the seedfile with @ in front of; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-05/msg00368.html (14,800 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]