Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Copypools\s+for\s+disks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Copypools\s+for\s+disks\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Copypools for disks (score: 1): Author: Fred Johanson <fred AT MIDWAY.UCHICAGO DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:57:12 -0600; I'm nearly ready to activate DRM on a new server, but I have a worry about copypools for disk storage. One of the diskpools is for smaller servers which migrate to a limited number of collocated tape; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-01/msg00431.html (11,043 bytes)
2. Re: Copypools for disks (score: 1): Author: Joerg Nouvertne <joerg.nouvertne AT WTAL DOT DE>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:58:26 +0100; No, from a logical standpoint, each file exists only twice: The "original" in the primary storage pool, and a copy in the corresponding copy pool. A user does not have to care about the underlying st; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-01/msg00478.html (11,726 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]