Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Copies\s+of\s+DR\s+data\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Copies\s+of\s+DR\s+data\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Copies of DR data (score: 1): Author: Dale Gieseke <Dale.Gieseke AT TORO DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:15:48 -0500; We copy all our backup and archive data to copy storage pools each morning and send these tapes offsite for disaster recovery purposes. It has been suggested that we should have two copies of all dat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00349.html (10,751 bytes)
2. Re: Copies of DR data (score: 1): Author: Lindsay Morris <lmorris AT OPENMIC DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 12:45:29 -0400; Seems like overkill to me. But yes, in the event of a disaster you ARE down to just one copy. If your data volume is not huge and you can afford it, keep a second copy pool. Or, you could institute a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00352.html (12,391 bytes)
3. Re: Copies of DR data (score: 1): Author: Kelly Lipp <lipp AT STORSOL DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:01:22 -0600; And what would happen, then, if the second set were also destroyed in shipping? The problem is one can never get to 100% reliability. Given that, one needs to determine how much to spend to ensure a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00353.html (10,887 bytes)
4. Copies of DR data (score: 1): Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:31:35 -0500; We copy all our backup and archive data to copy storage pools each morning and send these tapes offsite for disaster recovery purposes. It has been suggested that we should have two copies of all dat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00354.html (10,852 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]