Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Colocating\s+in\s+a\s+limited\s+library\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Colocating\s+in\s+a\s+limited\s+library\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Colocating in a limited library (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <PrathW1 AT CENTRAL.SSD.JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 10:45:25 -0400; We have an automated tape library. I just check in tape cartridges in "scratch" status, and let ADSM pull tapes as needed from the scratch pool into the backup and archive tape pools. My backup tape; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-05/msg00098.html (11,435 bytes)
2. Re: Colocating in a limited library (score: 1): Author: "Kent L. Johnson" <johnsk6 AT RPI DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 11:27:23 -0400; We use to the 'maxscratch' parameter of the storage pool to accomplish this. ADSM will never allocate more than 'maxscratch' volumes for the storage pool. So, it accomplishes your objective. In one o; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-05/msg00100.html (12,646 bytes)
3. Re: Colocating in a limited library (score: 1): Author: Mary Vollmer <Mary_Vollmer AT MGIC DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 12:23:51 -0400; We are not there yet but I will be in the same situation. I was going to group my clients by size with a maximum of 10 clients per group. I was then going to set up a storage group for each client gr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-05/msg00104.html (12,247 bytes)
4. Re: Colocating in a limited library (score: 1): Author: Cyndi Flis </G=Cynthia/S=Flis AT TRAVELERS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 08:16:00 -0400; We have 35/70 GB DLT tapes. We will be backing up about 300 ADSM clients. We have DEEPLY analyzed storage pool options keeping both backup and recovery in mind. Issues: Large tapes (35/70GB) Many cli; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-05/msg00129.html (13,401 bytes)
5. Re: Colocating in a limited library (score: 1): Author: "Wayne T. Smith" <wts AT MAIL.CAPS.MAINE DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 11:23:33 -0500; Cyndi Flis wrote, in part.. ADSM is just trying to do the collocation well. Since we have no robot/library and quite vocal operators, we try to minimize tape mounts. :-) However, restores of relative; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-05/msg00140.html (12,119 bytes)
6. Re: Colocating in a limited library (score: 1): Author: Sal Salak Juraj <IMCEAMS-KEBALINZ_CENTRAL_sal AT MSMAIL.KEBA.CO DOT AT>; Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 19:29:00 +0200; Wanda, I handle similar problem exactly how you want to handle it, and it works pretty fine. In the initial state I was even able to control a bit which client wil go to which tape. First I defined S; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-05/msg00144.html (12,709 bytes)
7. Re: Colocating in a limited library (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <PrathW1 AT CENTRAL.SSD.JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 09:02:57 -0400; Thanks very much for the information..; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-05/msg00162.html (13,286 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]