Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Collocation\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Collocation\s+question\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Collocation question (score: 1): Author: "Grendelman M. (Martijn)" <Martijn.Grendelman AT NL.FORTIS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:54:51 +0200; Hi all, Currently we have one big tape pool for our Netware backups. Now we want to split this pool in two, with collocation turned on for one of the new pools and turned off for the other. From ther; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00715.html (11,229 bytes)
2. Re: Collocation question (score: 1): Author: James SPORER <james.sporer AT CCMAIL.ADP.WISC DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:14:32 -0600; I would just leave the data in the non-collocated pool and start backing up to the collocated pool. Eventually the data in the non-collocated pool will expire and things will be collocated. Your orig; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00728.html (11,771 bytes)
3. Re: Collocation question (score: 1): Author: "Kelly J. Lipp" <lipp AT STORSOL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:16:02 -0600; Why do you think you need collocation? Collocation can put a strain on something you do everyday (backup) while offering perhaps a faster restore (something you don't do everyday). Are your restores; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00734.html (10,950 bytes)
4. Re: Collocation question (score: 1): Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:39:21 -0500; I would just leave the data in the non-collocated pool and start backing up to the collocated pool. Eventually the data in the non-collocated pool will expire and things will be collocated. Your orig; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00735.html (11,915 bytes)
5. Re: Collocation question (score: 1): Author: Doug Thorneycroft <dthorneycroft AT LACSD DOT ORG>; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:56:14 -0700; I did the same thing a couple of years ago. I created the new storage pool and exported the smaller nodes data one at a time to the new pool (The larger node would have taken too long to export) afte; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00810.html (11,902 bytes)
6. Collocation question (score: 1): Author: "Kelly J. Lipp" <lipp AT STORSOL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 10:44:22 -0600; My understanding of collocation is that if ADSM can't find a scratch tape or empty volume for a collocated pool, it will put data on an existing tape, essentially doubling up clients onto tapes. Is t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00813.html (10,521 bytes)
7. Re: Collocation question (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <PrathW1 AT CENTRAL.SSD.JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 12:59:42 -0400; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00815.html (11,049 bytes)
8. FW: Collocation question (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <PrathW1 AT CENTRAL.SSD.JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 13:09:07 -0400; My apologies, the previous message came without a reply... --; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00817.html (12,054 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]