Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Collocation\s+Questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Collocation\s+Questions\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Collocation Questions (score: 1): Author: Dennis Melburn W IT743 <melburn.dennis AT SIEMENS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:45:33 -0500; I am doing server recovery exercises at all of our sites that have TSM servers (TSM 5.3.2.0 on W2K3). Part of the recovery process is to recall back tapes in our copy storage pools that belong to the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-01/msg00018.html (11,247 bytes)
2. Re: Collocation Questions (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:00:07 -0500; Yes, you can collocate the copy pool and not the primary pool, no problem. Yes, it will decrease the number of tapes per node. However, If you are sending the copy pool tapes offsite with a manual pu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-01/msg00019.html (12,605 bytes)
3. Re: Collocation Questions (score: 1): Author: Dennis Melburn W IT743 <melburn.dennis AT SIEMENS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:39:35 -0500; OK, well that answers a lot of my questions, but is this still the case when your copy storage pool tapes are usually offsite? I tried to do a move nodedata in our test domain for the copy pool and i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-01/msg00027.html (13,627 bytes)
4. Re: Collocation Questions (score: 1): Author: David E Ehresman <deehre01 AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:45:22 -0500; even if the tapes are offsite in a vaulting location? << Yes, if you are doing expirations and reclaims. The reclaims will read the onsite primary storage volumes to recreate the offsite copy pool v; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-01/msg00038.html (10,660 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]