Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cleanup\s+Backupgroups\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cleanup\s+Backupgroups\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Cleanup Backupgroups (score: 1): Author: Sam Sheppard <SHS AT SDDPC.SANNET DOT GOV>; Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:02:23 PST; -- Top of message -- We also just went from 4.2.0 to 4.2.3 on OS/390 2.10. Ran Cleanup on both of our servers. It ran for maybe 10 minutes and finished with no errors reported. If you are finding tha; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-12/msg00760.html (12,819 bytes)
2. Re: cleanup backupgroups (score: 1): Author: Matt Simpson <msimpson AT UKY DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:52:31 -0400; I'm a newcomer to this list, and a newcomer to TSM. So there's a very good chance that I'm totally confused. I'm catching the tail end of this cleanup backupgroups discussion, and I need some clarifi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00642.html (12,171 bytes)
3. Re: cleanup backupgroups (score: 1): Author: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>; Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:46:19 +0300; Matt, you got it right - there is a problem with SystemObject expiration introduced in v4.2.2 and you have to run CLEANUP BACKUPGROUP to prevent enourmous high space usage in DB and storage pool. Thi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00647.html (13,156 bytes)
4. Re: cleanup backupgroups (score: 1): Author: Steve Roder <spr AT REXX.ACSU.BUFFALO DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:51:58 -0400; The "Cleanup" command does not exist on 4.2.2.0. Gee, I guess if it did, then IBM would have introduced a bug, and the fix for it, in the same release! I don't think the bug came in 4.2.2.0. Tivoli; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00652.html (13,673 bytes)
5. Re: cleanup backupgroups (score: 1): Author: Joseph Dawes <jdawes AT CHUBB DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:05:01 -0400; does that expiration problem with System objects exist on 4.2.1.9? Joseph Dawes I/T Infrasctructure - Unix Technical Support Chubb & Son, a Division of Federal Insurance Company 15 MountainView Road; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00654.html (10,853 bytes)
6. Re: cleanup backupgroups (score: 1): Author: "Seay, Paul" <seay_pd AT NAPTHEON DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 20:52:48 -0400; SYSTEM OBJECTS is a windows thing. If you do not have windows clients, you probably do not have the problem. The release you are running 4.2.2.0 is not a good release to be on. I would recommend you; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00675.html (12,850 bytes)
7. Re: cleanup backupgroups (score: 1): Author: Tab Trepagnier <Tab.Trepagnier AT LAITRAM DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:33:25 -0500; The one thing I've missed in this discussion thread is whether the version 4.2.2 that introduced the bug is the server or the client version. I am still running server version 4.1.5.0 on AIX, but my; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00681.html (11,064 bytes)
8. Re: cleanup backupgroups (score: 1): Author: "Seay, Paul" <seay_pd AT NAPTHEON DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 02:26:08 -0400; SERVER Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Naptheon Inc. 757-688-8180 The one thing I've missed in this discussion thread is whether the version 4.2.2 that introduced the bug is the server or the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00682.html (11,380 bytes)
9. Re: CLEANUP BACKUPGROUPS (score: 1): Author: Mahesh Tailor <MTailor AT CARILION DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:28:20 -0500; JFYI, I ran this successfully today on an ITSM 5.1.5.1 [AIX] server. Mahesh I am interested in reading your write-up. Is it complete, and if so, under what subject? If not, do you have an estimate on; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg01456.html (13,330 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]