Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Boosting\s+performance\s+of\s+the\s+Solaris\s+server\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Boosting\s+performance\s+of\s+the\s+Solaris\s+server\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Boosting performance of the Solaris server? (score: 1): Author: Russell Street <r.street AT AUCKLAND.AC DOT NZ>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 16:31:35 +1200; Hello... Any ideas how to make ADSM work faster than I am seeing it at the moment? For example, doing a back up to a disk storage pool across FDDI I only see about 500-600 Kb/sec as reported by ADSM; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-04/msg00657.html (12,003 bytes)
2. Boosting performance of the Solaris server? (score: 1): Author: Jerry Lawson <jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 07:52:34 -0400; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-04/msg00659.html (10,782 bytes)
3. Boosting performance of the Solaris server? (score: 1): Author: INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 18:08:48 -0500; First, let me say that I have never taken much stock in the KB/sec calculation - I think that since they are taken on the fly, there is some built in error in these numbers. For example, if there is; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-04/msg00660.html (13,282 bytes)
4. Re: Boosting performance of the Solaris server? (score: 1): Author: Francisco Franco <francisco.franco AT HYDRO.ON DOT CA>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 12:33:00 -0400; Hi Russell, Well, I am using AIX 3.2.5 and I don't mean to say that AIX is better or worse than any other UNIX or O/S, I have used Solaris, Sun O/S, HP-UX, OSF/1, etc and I find that somewhere along; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-04/msg00669.html (14,498 bytes)
5. Re: Boosting performance of the Solaris server? (score: 1): Author: "Dwight E. Cook" <decook AT AMOCO DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 12:18:44 -0500; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-04/msg00671.html (10,862 bytes)
6. Re: Boosting performance of the Solaris server? (score: 1): Author: Russell Street <r.street AT AUCKLAND.AC DOT NZ>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 21:15:11 +1200; Hello all... Thanks for all the responses to my queries. You have given me much to think about. After consideration, I do not think I have a "network performance" problems, nor a problem with other t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-04/msg00689.html (12,023 bytes)
7. Re: Boosting performance of the Solaris server? (score: 1): Author: Dave Sanders <DSanders AT MASSMUTUAL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 08:37:34 -0400; Based on what you posted, it looks like you are getting around 177/megs/hour. Is that transfer rate acceptable to you?? At one time, we were publicizing the fact that we were getting over 250/meg/hou; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-04/msg00694.html (15,775 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]