Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*BackupExec\s+and\s+ADSM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*BackupExec\s+and\s+ADSM\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. BackupExec and ADSM (score: 1): Author: Brad Diefendorf <bradd AT SELECT DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 14:43:30 -0500; This is a multi-part message in MIME format.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-12/msg00697.html (10,234 bytes)
2. Re: BackupExec and ADSM (score: 1): Author: Terry Allan <tallan1308 AT EMAIL.MSN DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 17:39:51 -0500; Put simply, the products can co-exist, but they are competitive. As Seagate explains it, their product came from a LAN environment, and ADSM from mainframe. And that's pretty much true. But they will; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-12/msg00700.html (10,991 bytes)
3. BackupExec and ADSM (score: 1): Author: Brad Diefendorf <bradd AT SELECT DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 18:03:07 -0500; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-12/msg00701.html (10,784 bytes)
4. Re: BackupExec and ADSM (score: 1): Author: "Boireau, Eric (MED-Cap Gemini)" <BOIREER AT EUROMSX.GEMSE DOT FR>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 10:12:41 +0100; Hi, We used ADSM and BackupExec V7.0. In fact every body that I have contact about this, used this configuration between BENT & ADSM to backup NT server with specific application like (Microsoft Exch; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-12/msg00710.html (12,335 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]