Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anyone\s+using\s+VTS\s+for\s+storage\s+pool\s+volumes\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anyone\s+using\s+VTS\s+for\s+storage\s+pool\s+volumes\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Anyone using VTS for storage pool volumes? (score: 1): Author: Bill Boyer <bill.boyer AT VERIZON DOT NET>; Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:58:11 -0400; We have a client that wants to move their small occupancy nodes to their VTS and turn on collocation. Is there anyone using a VTS for TSM storage pool volumes? I would like to hear about your experie; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00197.html (10,738 bytes)
2. Re: Anyone using VTS for storage pool volumes? (score: 1): Author: "Seay, Paul" <seay_pd AT NAPTHEON DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:29:24 -0400; Under the covers the VTS is, guess what, ADSM/TSM. Now, that said, each logical volume is 800MB. The append operation that TSM would be doing to each tape could be nasty. What has to happen is the lo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00234.html (12,246 bytes)
3. Re: Anyone using VTS for storage pool volumes? (score: 1): Author: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT MAIL.TJU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:08:06 -0400; We used to do this. Appending to existing tapes was ugly. The VTS staged the old version of the virtual volume into disk cache, appended to it, wrote the updated version to real tape, and discarded; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00468.html (11,549 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]