Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Antwort\:\s+Re\:\s+Management\s+Classes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Antwort\:\s+Re\:\s+Management\s+Classes\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Antwort: Re: Management Classes (score: 1): Author: "Mecki M." <rmeschon AT OTELO.IBMMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 15:17:24 +0200; Hi Mark, yes, it is the retonly parameter. NT-Clients don't use the DIRMC option regardless of what you define. Stop testing, there's no way out. Regards Mecki; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-04/msg00600.html (10,136 bytes)
2. Re: Antwort: Re: Management Classes (score: 1): Author: "Remeta, Mark" <MRemeta AT SELIGMANDATA DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 11:32:35 -0400; I beg to differ. I used the dirmc parameter and it worked! Mark; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-04/msg00608.html (10,638 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]