Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Antwort\:\s+Anyone\s+seen\s+this\s+before\?\?\?\?\?\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Antwort: Anyone seen this before??????? (score: 1)
Author: Matthew Muldoon <muldoonm AT MAINSTOR DOT DE>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 13:38:49 +0100
maybe they were checked in as private and then later after a reclamation they were empty and returned as private . ADSM will return this tape to private after reclamation. if it was checked in as scr
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-10/msg01575.html (10,589 bytes)

2. Re: Antwort: Anyone seen this before??????? (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Caupain <j.caupain AT AMSTERDAM DOT NL>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 13:58:45 +0100
Hellow Matthew, When I found out that they were all marked private I issued a upd libv <vol> stat=scratch. Now I see that they're marked private again. It's really strange......
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-10/msg01577.html (10,892 bytes)

3. Re: Antwort: Anyone seen this before??????? (score: 1)
Author: Nick Cassimatis <nickpc AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 09:00:53 -0400
Were these new tapes that you didn't DSMLABEL? I did that once, and whenever ADSM tried to load one, it would set it to Private because it couldn't read the label from the tape itself. Nick Cassimati
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-10/msg01594.html (10,591 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu