Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+2\s+3494\s+Tape\s+libraries\s+seem\s+to\s+have\s+very\s+different\s+capacities\.\s+Any\s+ideas\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. AW: 2 3494 Tape libraries seem to have very different capacities. Any ideas? (score: 1)
Author: Schaub Joachim Paul ABX-SECE-ZH <Joachim.Schaub AT ABRAXAS DOT CH>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:11:16 +0200
How about your reclaim and collocation settings? Are they equal? regards joachim --Ursprüngliche Nachricht-- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]Im Auftrag von John C Dur
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-08/msg00591.html (14,994 bytes)

2. Re: AW: 2 3494 Tape libraries seem to have very different capacities. Any ideas? (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Sparrman <Daniel.Sparrman AT EXIST DOT SE>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:16:19 +0200
Hi There can be several reasons why there is a difference in the number of scratch tapes between your onsite and offsite 3494:s: 1. Reuse Delay. Is reuse delay activated on the off-site pool(s)? 2. I
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-08/msg00594.html (16,133 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu