Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Incrementals\s+with\s+TIR\s+and\s+without\s+Archive\s+Bit\s+back\s+up\s+almost\s+full\s+images\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. AW: [Veritas-bu] Incrementals with TIR and without Archive Bit back up almost full images (score: 1)
Author: Gerd.Leibrock AT KNO-BS DOT de (Gerd.Leibrock AT KNO-BS DOT de)
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 18:23:07 +0200
Dan, thank you for your reply. Our NBU version is 3.4.1. Sorry, but I cant agree with you. As I said in my first mail, the archive bit is not a secure base for backups because everybody can set or un
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-10/msg00215.html (12,690 bytes)

2. AW: [Veritas-bu] Incrementals with TIR and without Archive Bit back up almost full images (score: 1)
Author: Gerd.Leibrock AT KNO-BS DOT de (Gerd.Leibrock AT KNO-BS DOT de)
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 19:04:15 +0200
David, if you think so, please tell me how you will restore a "true" image of -let me say- a directory with many subdirectories, where some subdirectories and files have been moved and renamed and ot
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-10/msg00218.html (12,376 bytes)

3. AW: [Veritas-bu] Incrementals with TIR and without Archive Bit back up almost full images (score: 1)
Author: Gerd.Leibrock AT KNO-BS DOT de (Gerd.Leibrock AT KNO-BS DOT de)
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 19:22:16 +0200
David, thanks for your reply. I think NBU is a very fine product, it surpasses TSM in some fields, especially what concerns central control by the admin client, but I'am deceived that such a bug is p
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-10/msg00220.html (12,218 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu